Talking Jesus Is From China - Is He Made of Lead?

December 11, 2007

 

The genius that is capitalism and religion have paired up to offer the Talking Jesus doll at Wal-Mart and Target (Source). Indeed, I just heard about it on NPR…

Of course, the easy media angle is whether Jesus will out compete traditional toys, i.e. will kids play with it? Some even call it the next religious Tickle-Me-Elmo. Whatever…too easy. Softball news garbage. The next easiest controversy is whether it’s some kind of heresy to make a Jesus doll in the first place. Another whatever.

What I immediately thought of is whether Talking Jesus was made in China, whether he was made of plastic (PVC - poly-vinyl-chloride), and if he would be dogged by the lead controversy.

Wouldn’t that be fitting? It’s cheap toy crap, no matter what veil you put on it…And the religious do-gooders couldn’t think ahead of short-term cheapness.

In fact, he is made of PVC and is made in China. I can’t answer the lead question without an independent laboratory test, but it wouldn’t surprise me one bit…The toy recalls for plastic toys made in China are an obvious source to base that on (NYTimes).

Who cares about PVC? Well, to start it’s not exactly safe to produce (Building Green). And PVC can contain phlalates to make it flexible/pliable, which course aren’t very good to ingest, ala BPA plastic concerns.

This isn’t new, just newly discovered. A few years ago I bought a measuring tape at Target that was plastic and a sticker on the box, saying it contained lead and I should wash my hands after using. I returned it.

So how about it? Can someone test Jesus to see if he’s made of lead?

 


“They Tried to Teach My Baby Science”

August 27, 2007

From the Onion


Lactic Acid Muscle Build-Up Is a Myth

August 17, 2007

In my continuous quest to show my WAFC Intermediate Summer League Regular Season (12-1) and Tournament (6-0) Champion Ultimate Frisbee team that I know everything about long-held sports and health scientific myths, I hereby present the fact that lactic acid does not build up in your muscles and cause soreness. It’s a myth. I know it’s crazy - just like the “Stretching Prevents Injury” myth from last week.

There is no lactic acid threshold you need to stay under. It doesn’t build up. It’s “one of the classic mistakes in the history of science.” Says who? Those darn scientists.

Lactic Acid is Not Muscles’ Foe, It’s Fuel” (NYTimes)

It’s a classic story of a scientist having an idea that something was wrong and being persistent until others began to test the same thing and back him up. But how do you tell if a scientists is a crackpot or a diamond in the rough? At first you can’t. But if what they say is replicable and can be reproduced by others independently, you’ve got something.

In part, this is why creationists are full of it - there’s no logic or testing involved in their theory…no actual science. Because in order for something to be scientific, you actually have to test it. Otherwise, it’s putting the answer you know ahead of the testing you’re going to do. In the Creationists’ case, it’s proving that the world’s longest game of written “telephone,” i.e. the Bible, is true.

And while we’re on the topic, has anyone tried to do a volumetric study of Noah’s ark and all of the world’s animals? Could you even fit them all in there, much less keep them alive for 40 days? I kind of doubt it.


Stuart Davis Live Music Videos

March 13, 2007

My favorite musical artist is Stuart Davis…self discribed musical poet on sex, god, and rock n’ roll. Sometimes he gets a little esoteric (okay, a lot of times) but I dig the music. Maybe one day he’ll come to DC and I’ll show you, but here are some videos to tide you over (live performance at the Fine Line Cafe, July 29, 2001 in Minneapolis, Minnesota)…(Source: Dream Usher)

DIVE

FLOWER OF A ZERO

UNIVERSE COMMUNION

JONAH

VERONICA

DOPPLEGANGER

KALEIDOSCOPE

FALL AWAKE

DROWN

DRESDEN

SAVORING SAMSARA

ROCK STARS AND MODELS

SWIM

PSYCHO KILLLER


DC V-Day - Relationship Equations

February 14, 2007

What is a relationship if it can’t be defined by an equation? Nothing! Let’s go…

  • Self (S) = emotional (E) + spiritual (Sp) + sexual (Sx) + physical (P)
  • Partner (Pt) = E + Sp + Sx + P
  • Relationship (S + Pt) = E^2 + 2ESp + 2ESx + 2EP + Sp^2 + 2SpSx + 2SpP + Sx^2 + 2SxP + P^2

No wonder relationships are so confusing!

You can also try to formalize your relationship through a committment:

  • Committment (C) = personal (P) + legal (L) + religious (R) + spiritual (Sp)
  • Committment (C) = your decision + approval of gov’t + approval of religion + metaphysical symbiosis

Let’s review some of the different commitment equations, which have changed over the years as different political and socio-economic changes have occurred:

  • Traditional = personal + legal + spiritual + religious
  • Hollywood = 0
  • GLBT (in the U.S.) = personal + (spiritual) (optional)
  • Atheist = personal + legal
  • Arranged Marriage = legal + (religious) (by culture)
  • Green Card Marriage = legal
  • Shotgun = legal + religious
  • Others?

Now, here’s what I find interesting. My girlfriend and I have been together for 3 years and own a house together (an obvious financial, and defacto personal, committment). We haven’t formally had an official committment, be it a party with friends, a civil union, or a marriage.

When we visit relatives, some of them make moral objections to us sleeping in the same bed because we’re not married, which we do every night at home, and which I find oddly inconsistent given our likely formal committment equation:

  • Traditional = personal + legal + spiritual + religious
  • Us = personal + legal

Under no known circumstances would we adopt a traditional committment equation which included religion as a component. But I would bet that the “legal” addition to the equation would miraculously make it okay for them, even though they object on a religious basis. Why is that different? Shouldn’t their moral outrage stay the same since we wouldn’t have a religious or spiritual component to our committment?

Our relationship would have a legally binding committment but nothing more. Their concern isn’t with our legal rights and frankly, that addition is a formality to making the personal decision, which is much more binding in my opinion.

And when they come visit, they don’t have a problem staying at our house, where we’re being immoral. Shouldn’t moral indignation trascend location and ownership?


Lurking behind Saint Mary’s University of MN

December 20, 2006

UPDATE: 12/20/06

Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota has announced that Brother Craig Franz has resigned as the University’s President over allegations of an inappropriate relationship with a former student while President at Saint Mary’s College of California (announcement). As both a sexual relationship for a Christian Brother and the inappropriateness of a President-student relationship, the issue was revealed through sources at the former college.

ORIGINAL POST: 4/1/05

I recently went back to visit my collegiate alma mater, Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota and after walking around and seeing the sights and smells of history (what’s left of it after new construction in some cases), was happy with having gone there.

But after talking with a faculty/staff person, all that’s rosy in the alumni magazine, isn’t so in real life. Apparently, Saint Mary’s faculty/staff pay ranks very low relative to similar colleges, causing SMU to be a revolving door for people looking to get experience and move on. They’ve taken pay freezes and significant cuts in recent years, which affects the quality that SMU can attract.

The inside story is that prior to the President Brother Louis era, the faculty & staff had much more crossover and comraderie in everything from attending sporting events, helping students out in classes, and maybe most importantly solidarity in contracts, but now they have been fractured into silos that compete against each other. Morale is pretty low as a result of all this.

Brother Louis decided to retire and SMU had narrowed it down to two non-brother candidates that were both very qualified and the faculty/staff were excited about. But an 11th hour injunction brought the process to a halt while they let another candidate in, who also happends to be a former SMU administrator, Brother Franz. I should make it clear that I don’t really have an opinion on Brother Franz - he seemed nice enough when I was there - but two things are missing from the discussion.

1. The process smells funny;

2. Brother Franz’s former school, Saint Mary’s College of CA, has had a major donor scandal (and here) involving $112 million in unpaid pledges after the school had moved forward on spending the money already. In addition, there were allegations that the campus was not properly reporting incidents of sexual assault to the proper authorities (news article, formal complaint, inquiry letter).

That discussion has been silent to alumni. I don’t have any idea on the specifics of his involvement in the issue but do his credentials outweigh this black-mark and still have enough political capital left-over to allow him the 11th hour entry into the at-that-point closed process?

In fact alumni in general are fairly well insulated from any controversy. Everything is hunky dory in the alumni magazine to a passive alumni who just reads what he sent - I suppose I’m as guilty as anyone of that (we all have priorities) but there’s always a story behind the story…


Church Ratings

October 18, 2006

The Washington City Paper, the Twin Cities City Pages equivalent, has an amusing column called “Service Industry: Rating DC’s Houses of Worship.”

Topics include: Dress Code, Teen Wooing Activity, and ratings on Congregational Fervor, Food for the Soul, Food for the Body, and Overall Worship Power. Sweet!


God and the Environment

October 12, 2006

Grist Magazine has a special series on God and the environment, that parallels Bill Moyers’ PBS special, “Is God Green?

I’m not sure if God is green, but I’m pretty sure abject poverty, supported by our need for cheap crap, isn’t a favorite. I’m amazed at the number of situations that evolve from our consumer habits that have trickle effects in ways no one recognizes. Cotton t-shirts are rife with “issues,” from pesticides in growing them to cheap factories overseas making them and paying the locals pennies. You can go crazy (and some do), trying to be perfect on all issues and products. But why do good, honest, average people still tolerate the things they do know about? Would they want their kids working in a factory for 50 cents a day? Do we like all the man-made chemicals that are found in our blood these days because there’s no burden of safety for new chemicals? It’s not just environmental issues - equity and health are equally important…


Four kinds of Christian Gods

September 12, 2006

USAToday reported on a Baylor University survey and report about Americans’ views on religion and God. They summarized four types of Gods that people believed in (minus the 8.2% that don’t believe in God):

• The Authoritarian God (31% of Americans overall) is angry at humanity’s sins and engaged in every creature’s life and world affairs.

•The Benevolent God (23% overall) still sets absolute standards for mankind in the Bible but it is a forgiving God, more like the father who embraces his repentant prodigal son in the Bible.

•The Critical God (16% overall) has his judgmental eye on the world, but he’s not going to intervene, either to punish or to comfort.

•The Distant God (24% overall) is one that launched the world, then left it spinning on its own.

I find it interesting that people can have access to such global information about the diversity of the world’s religions and still think that they are the one and only answer, i.e. the Authoritarian God people. Christianity is apparently 33% of the world’s population, so the Authoritarians are about 10% of the world if the US numbers can be translated globally (who knows though). So, 90% of us are dead wrong and going to hell?

What if the Criticals, Distants, and Non-Believers joined forces though? We would crush the Authoritarians! Not really though, since our God (or lack thereof) wouldn’t really do anything to them. Maybe we could just do a little though - make them cook us dinner on Fridays or something.

The interpretations of God are as diverse as that of politics, but so far, politicians are the only ones spending my money…


Separation of Church and State

July 31, 2006

Finally, someone in the fundamentalist movement can see the slippery slope to have a neo-conservative Christian theocracy in the government…

NY Times

July 30, 2006

 

“Disowning Conservative Politics, Evangelical Pastor Rattles Flock”

MAPLEWOOD, Minn. — Like most pastors who lead thriving evangelical megachurches, the Rev. Gregory A. Boyd was asked frequently to give his blessing — and the church’s — to conservative political candidates and causes.

The requests came from church members and visitors alike: Would he please announce a rally against gay marriage during services? Would he introduce a politician from the pulpit? Could members set up a table in the lobby promoting their anti-abortion work? Would the church distribute “voters’ guides” that all but endorsed Republican candidates? And with the country at war, please couldn’t the church hang an American flag in the sanctuary?

After refusing each time, Mr. Boyd finally became fed up, he said. Before the last presidential election, he preached six sermons called “The Cross and the Sword” in which he said the church should steer clear of politics, give up moralizing on sexual issues, stop claiming the United States as a “Christian nation” and stop glorifying American military campaigns.

“When the church wins the culture wars, it inevitably loses,” Mr. Boyd preached. “When it conquers the world, it becomes the world. When you put your trust in the sword, you lose the cross.”

Mr. Boyd says he is no liberal. He is opposed to abortion and thinks homosexuality is not God’s ideal. The response from his congregation at Woodland Hills Church here in suburban St. Paul — packed mostly with politically and theologically conservative, middle-class evangelicals — was passionate. Some members walked out of a sermon and never returned. By the time the dust had settled, Woodland Hills, which Mr. Boyd founded in 1992, had lost about 1,000 of its 5,000 members.

But there were also congregants who thanked Mr. Boyd, telling him they were moved to tears to hear him voice concerns they had been too afraid to share.

“Most of my friends are believers,” said Shannon Staiger, a psychotherapist and church member, “and they think if you’re a believer, you’ll vote for Bush. And it’s scary to go against that.”

Sermons like Mr. Boyd’s are hardly typical in today’s evangelical churches. But the upheaval at Woodland Hills is an example of the internal debates now going on in some evangelical colleges, magazines and churches. A common concern is that the Christian message is being compromised by the tendency to tie evangelical Christianity to the Republican Party and American nationalism, especially through the war in Iraq.

At least six books on this theme have been published recently, some by Christian publishing houses. Randall Balmer, a religion professor at Barnard College and an evangelical, has written “Thy Kingdom Come: How the Religious Right Distorts the Faith and Threatens America — an Evangelical’s Lament.”

And Mr. Boyd has a new book out, “The Myth of a Christian Nation: How the Quest for Political Power Is Destroying the Church,” which is based on his sermons.

“There is a lot of discontent brewing,” said Brian D. McLaren, the founding pastor at Cedar Ridge Community Church in Gaithersburg, Md., and a leader in the evangelical movement known as the “emerging church,” which is at the forefront of challenging the more politicized evangelical establishment.

“More and more people are saying this has gone too far — the dominance of the evangelical identity by the religious right,” Mr. McLaren said. “You cannot say the word ‘Jesus’ in 2006 without having an awful lot of baggage going along with it. You can’t say the word ‘Christian,’ and you certainly can’t say the word ‘evangelical’ without it now raising connotations and a certain cringe factor in people.

“Because people think, ‘Oh no, what is going to come next is homosexual bashing, or pro-war rhetoric, or complaining about ‘activist judges.’ ”

Mr. Boyd said he had cleared his sermons with the church’s board, but his words left some in his congregation stunned. Some said that he was disrespecting President Bush and the military, that he was soft on abortion or telling them not to vote.

“When we joined years ago, Greg was a conservative speaker,” said William Berggren, a lawyer who joined the church with his wife six years ago. “But we totally disagreed with him on this. You can’t be a Christian and ignore actions that you feel are wrong. A case in point is the abortion issue. If the church were awake when abortion was passed in the 70’s, it wouldn’t have happened. But the church was asleep.”

Mr. Boyd, 49, who preaches in blue jeans and rumpled plaid shirts, leads a church that occupies a squat block-long building that was once a home improvement chain store.

The church grew from 40 members in 12 years, based in no small part on Mr. Boyd’s draw as an electrifying preacher who stuck closely to Scripture. He has degrees from Yale Divinity School and Princeton Theological Seminary, and he taught theology at Bethel College in St. Paul, where he created a controversy a few years ago by questioning whether God fully knew the future. Some pastors in his own denomination, the Baptist General Conference, mounted an effort to evict Mr. Boyd from the denomination and his teaching post, but he won that battle.

He is known among evangelicals for a bestselling book, “Letters From a Skeptic,” based on correspondence with his father, a leftist union organizer and a lifelong agnostic — an exchange that eventually persuaded his father to embrace Christianity.

Mr. Boyd said he never intended his sermons to be taken as merely a critique of the Republican Party or the religious right. He refuses to share his party affiliation, or whether he has one, for that reason. He said there were Christians on both the left and the right who had turned politics and patriotism into “idolatry.”

He said he first became alarmed while visiting another megachurch’s worship service on a Fourth of July years ago. The service finished with the chorus singing “God Bless America” and a video of fighter jets flying over a hill silhouetted with crosses.

“I thought to myself, ‘What just happened? Fighter jets mixed up with the cross?’ ” he said in an interview.

Patriotic displays are still a mainstay in some evangelical churches. Across town from Mr. Boyd’s church, the sanctuary of North Heights Lutheran Church was draped in bunting on the Sunday before the Fourth of July this year for a “freedom celebration.” Military veterans and flag twirlers paraded into the sanctuary, an enormous American flag rose slowly behind the stage, and a Marine major who had served in Afghanistan preached that the military was spending “your hard-earned money” on good causes.

In his six sermons, Mr. Boyd laid out a broad argument that the role of Christians was not to seek “power over” others — by controlling governments, passing legislation or fighting wars. Christians should instead seek to have “power under” others — “winning people’s hearts” by sacrificing for those in need, as Jesus did, Mr. Boyd said.

“America wasn’t founded as a theocracy,” he said. “America was founded by people trying to escape theocracies. Never in history have we had a Christian theocracy where it wasn’t bloody and barbaric. That’s why our Constitution wisely put in a separation of church and state.

“I am sorry to tell you,” he continued, “that America is not the light of the world and the hope of the world. The light of the world and the hope of the world is Jesus Christ.”

Mr. Boyd lambasted the “hypocrisy and pettiness” of Christians who focus on “sexual issues” like homosexuality, abortion or Janet Jackson’s breast-revealing performance at the Super Bowl halftime show. He said Christians these days were constantly outraged about sex and perceived violations of their rights to display their faith in public.

“Those are the two buttons to push if you want to get Christians to act,” he said. “And those are the two buttons Jesus never pushed.”

Some Woodland Hills members said they applauded the sermons because they had resolved their conflicted feelings. David Churchill, a truck driver for U.P.S. and a Teamster for 26 years, said he had been “raised in a religious-right home” but was torn between the Republican expectations of faith and family and the Democratic expectations of his union.

When Mr. Boyd preached his sermons, “it was liberating to me,” Mr. Churchill said.

Mr. Boyd gave his sermons while his church was in the midst of a $7 million fund-raising campaign. But only $4 million came in, and 7 of the more than 50 staff members were laid off, he said.

Mary Van Sickle, the family pastor at Woodland Hills, said she lost 20 volunteers who had been the backbone of the church’s Sunday school.

“They said, ‘You’re not doing what the church is supposed to be doing, which is supporting the Republican way,’ ” she said. “It was some of my best volunteers.”

The Rev. Paul Eddy, a theology professor at Bethel College and the teaching pastor at Woodland Hills, said: “Greg is an anomaly in the megachurch world. He didn’t give a whit about church leadership, never read a book about church growth. His biggest fear is that people will think that all church is is a weekend carnival, with people liking the worship, the music, his speaking, and that’s it.”

In the end, those who left tended to be white, middle-class suburbanites, church staff members said. In their place, the church has added more members who live in the surrounding community — African-Americans, Hispanics and Hmong immigrants from Laos.

This suits Mr. Boyd. His vision for his church is an ethnically and economically diverse congregation that exemplifies Jesus’ teachings by its members’ actions. He, his wife and three other families from the church moved from the suburbs three years ago to a predominantly black neighborhood in St. Paul.

Mr. Boyd now says of the upheaval: “I don’t regret any aspect of it at all. It was a defining moment for us. We let go of something we were never called to be. We just didn’t know the price we were going to pay for doing it.”

His congregation of about 4,000 is still digesting his message. Mr. Boyd arranged a forum on a recent Wednesday night to allow members to sound off on his new book. The reception was warm, but many of the 56 questions submitted in writing were pointed: Isn’t abortion an evil that Christians should prevent? Are you saying Christians should not join the military? How can Christians possibly have “power under” Osama bin Laden? Didn’t the church play an enormously positive role in the civil rights movement?

One woman asked: “So why NOT us? If we contain the wisdom and grace and love and creativity of Jesus, why shouldn’t we be the ones involved in politics and setting laws?”

Mr. Boyd responded: “I don’t think there’s a particular angle we have on society that others lack. All good, decent people want good and order and justice. Just don’t slap the label ‘Christian’ on it.”